You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Project: Submit user research results

Due Oct 6, 2023 by 11:59pm
Points 100
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload

No additional details were added for this assignment.

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 199 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

User research results

User research results
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
User personas _194086_1 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	30 to >22.5 pts Exemplary Three personas were described representing different categories of users for the project. The personas were grouped by attributes (e.g., goals, behaviors, and roles) important for the project. The personas were credible, detailed, and identified which tasks the personas would perform and why. _745508_1 22.5 to >15.0 pts Accomplished _798513_1 15 to >7.5 pts Acceptable One or two personas were described representing different categories of users for the project. Alternatively, the personas were missing critical detail such as which tasks the personas would perform and why. _745498_1 7.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging _745493_1 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The personas were not provided or the majority of the information is irrelevant. _745488_1 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 30 pts --
Task descriptions _194088_1 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	30 to >22.5 pts Exemplary The three task descriptions tell a complete story of use, are independent of interface detail, and are credible in relation to the project. The tasks covered were non-trivial and core to the project. _745510_1 22.5 to >15.0 pts Accomplished _798514_1 15 to >7.5 pts Acceptable The descriptions of the tasks were provided, but one or two of them were incomplete, contained too much interface detail, or were not credible in relation to the project. Alternatively, one or two of the tasks were perceived to be trivial or peripheral to the project. _745500_1 7.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging _745495_1 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The task descriptions were not provided or were incomplete or irrelevant. _745490_1 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 30 pts --
Method _194087_1 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary The method created an opportunity to gain significant insight into the users and tasks for the project. The description included the research questions, descriptions of the participants, study locations, study dates, duration, questions asked (for interviews) or focus (for observations), and task artifacts reviewed. The method was described with enough detail that the user research could be repeated. _745509_1 15 to >10.0 pts Accomplished _798515_1 10 to >5.0 pts Acceptable The method was appropriate but missed reasonable opportunities to gain insight into the users and tasks for the project. Alternatively, there were a few significant omissions in the description that made it difficult to understand what was done (e.g., the user research could not be reasonably repeated). _745499_1 5 to >0.0 pts Emerging _745494_1 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The method was not described or the information provided was irrelevant. _745489_1 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Slide design _194084_1 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary The design of the slide deck for the planned presentation enhanced the content. The choice of imagery, fonts, colors, and layout were effective; and the content had a logical organization. _745506_1 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished _798516_1 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable The design of the slide deck had noticeable problems, such as fonts being too small, too much textual content on the slide, or illogical organization. The problems, though present, did not overpower the content. _745496_1 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging _745491_1 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The design of the slide deck had many noticeable problems, such as the fonts being too small, having too much text on the slides, or illogical organization. The problems overpowered the content. _745486_1 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Delivery _194085_1 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary The team delivered the presentation effectively, highlighted the key insights of the user research, and were well prepared for the presentation. _745507_1 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished _798517_1 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable The team delivered the presentation but there were noticeable issues with the delivery such as awkward pauses, skipping content, or team members interrupting each other or forgetting what to say. _745497_1 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging _745492_1 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The delivery of the presentation was ineffective because the team was unprepared. _745487_1 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --