Rubric

Keep in mind that 173 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Low-fidelity prototype submission
Low-fidelity prototype submission
Criteria Ratings Pts
Appropriateness
threshold: pts
40 pts Exemplary The prototype is on the right track and has the potential to effectively address the goals of the project.
30 pts Accomplished
20 pts Acceptable The prototype addresses some of the goals of the project but will require further thinking and/or significant revision to address all of them.
10 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype is not on the right track. Addressing the goals of the project will likely require the creation of a different prototype.
pts
40 pts
--
Completeness
threshold: pts
40 pts Exemplary The prototype contains sufficient detail to walk through the interaction sequence for at least three main user tasks. It also includes extras, such as interaction for navigating between the tasks, task feedback, and error recovery.
30 pts Accomplished
20 pts Acceptable The prototype has interaction that supports only a subset of the main tasks from start to finish or the tasks can only be performed in isolation. Some of the extras such as navigation, good feedback, or error recovery might also be missing.
10 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype was not submitted or did not show interaction supporting any of the main user tasks for the project.
pts
40 pts
--
Slide design
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The design of the slide deck for the planned presentation enhanced the content. The choice of imagery, fonts, colors, and layout were effective; and the content had a logical organization.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The design of the slide deck had noticeable problems, such as fonts being too small, too much textual content on the slide, or illogical organization. The problems, though present, did not overpower the content.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The design of the slide deck had many noticeable problems, such as the fonts being too small, having too much text on the slides, or illogical organization. The problems overpowered the content.
pts
10 pts
--
Delivery
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The team delivered the prototype effectively, highlighted the key insights of the prototype, and were well prepared for the presentation.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The team delivered the presentation but there were noticeable issues with the delivery such as awkward pauses, skipping content, or team members interrupting each other or forgetting what to say.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The delivery of the presentation was ineffective because the team was unprepared.
pts
10 pts
--