(Extra credit) Project: Submit materials for live virtual project showcase

  • Due Dec 5, 2023 by 5pm
  • Points 1
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload
We want to prepare for the case where there are more teams who want to present during the virtual project showcase than we have scheduled time for on Wednesday. The showcase is from 9:30 - 10:45 a.m. Each team will have at most 4 minutes to present. In addition to submitting your presentation materials (a link to the slide deck is fine), please include your team's responses to the two questions below in the text field of the submission on Canvas:

  1. If needed, is your team able to remain on Zoom after the end of the scheduled lecture to present your project?
  2. If needed, if your team cannot remain on Zoom after the end of lecture, is your team willing to submit a video recording of the project presentation to the course staff by the end of the same day for the purpose of grading?
1701817200 12/05/2023 05:00pm

Rubric

Keep in mind that 92 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Extra credit for the live presentation showcase
Extra credit for the live presentation showcase
Criteria Ratings Pts
Concept
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
0.25 pts Exemplary The project concept (including the user need, limitations of existing approaches, and why the current project rocks!) was effectively communicated.
0.187 pts Accomplished
0.125 pts Acceptable The project concept was communicated, but some elements (e.g., the user need) were omitted or unclear.
0.062 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The project concept was not communicated.
pts
0.25 pts
--
Additional Comments
Demonstration
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
0.5 pts Exemplary The demonstration effectively captured the core user experience of the group's project (e.g., it showed how a user could accomplish two or more non-trivial tasks with the project's interface).
0.38 pts Accomplished
0.25 pts Acceptable The demonstration partially captured the core user experience of the group's project (e.g., it showed how a user could accomplish one non-trivial task with the project's interface).
0.13 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The demonstration did not capture the core user experience of the project (e.g., the tasks demonstrated were trivial for the project or were unclear).
pts
0.5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Delivery
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
0.25 pts Exemplary The team delivered the presentation effectively, and was well prepared for the presentation.
0.187 pts Accomplished
0.125 pts Acceptable The team delivered the presentation but there were noticeable issues with the delivery such as awkward pauses, skipping content, or team members interrupting each other or forgetting what to say.
0.062 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The delivery of the presentation was ineffective because the team was unprepared.
pts
0.25 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 1 out of 1