You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Project: Submit user evaluation results of functional prototype

Due Dec 8, 2023 by 11:59pm
Points 110
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload

No additional details were added for this assignment.

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 194 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

User testing of the functional prototype

User testing of the functional prototype
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Research Questions _9544 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary Three or more research questions were described and the motivation for these questions was explained. The questions were meaningful, appropriate, and testable for the project. blank 15 to >10.0 pts Accomplished 38330_6178 10 to >5.0 pts Acceptable Some of the research questions were not explained well or were inappropriate for the project. 38330_2044 5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_4103 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No questions were described, were not appropriate for the project, or were not comprehensible. blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Method 38330_8781 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	14 to >10.5 pts Exemplary The method was appropriate for answering the research questions and to gain insight into the project. The method included descriptions of the participants, tasks, evaluation locations, dates, duration, what was observed, and what questions were asked of the participants. There was enough detail that the method could be repeated. 38330_5894 10.5 to >7.0 pts Accomplished 38330_6096 7 to >3.5 pts Acceptable The method was not clearly described, important details were omitted preventing replicability, or was ineffective for answering the research questions. 38330_1227 3.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_6751 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No method was reported or was not appropriate for answering the research questions. 38330_9510 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 14 pts --
Data Collection 38330_396 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	14 to >10.5 pts Exemplary Data collection was reported with clear explanation for how the data was collected and how the data relates to the research questions. The data was complete, comprehensive, and insightful in relation to the research questions. 38330_3132 10.5 to >7.0 pts Accomplished 38330_3321 7 to >3.5 pts Acceptable The reporting of the data collection was unclear, or related to only a subset of the research questions. 38330_8676 3.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_9929 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No data collection was reported. 38330_7712 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 14 pts --
Results and Interpretation 38330_3153 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	32 to >24.0 pts Exemplary Results were provided for the research questions and drew from the user feedback, interaction data, and observations of use. The data was aggregated, visually summarized where appropriate, and interpreted in relation to the research questions. 38330_4931 24 to >16.0 pts Accomplished 38330_1883 16 to >8.0 pts Acceptable Results were provided for only some of the research questions, were difficult to understand, or were not interpreted in relation to the research questions. 38330_2053 8 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_9059 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No results were provided. 38330_2574 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 32 pts --
Design Ideas 38330_8562 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary Three non-trivial design ideas were described and were rooted in the study results. The ideas were plausible and, if implemented, would significantly improve the effectiveness of the prototype. 38330_6951 15 to >10.0 pts Accomplished 38330_8687 10 to >5.0 pts Acceptable Three design ideas were described, but some were not plausible or would not improve the user interface of the project. 38330_8196 5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_7649 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The design ideas were not described or were not relevant to the user interface of the project. 38330_7014 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Participants 38330_1055 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary The participants recruited for the study represented the personas for the project or the participants engaged in designed role play that effectively simulated the personas. 38330_9601 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished 38330_6668 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable The participants recruited for the study were only partially representative of the personas for the project. 38330_1247 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_8241 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The participants were not representative or described in relation to the personas for the project. 38330_5749 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --