Rubric

Keep in mind that 186 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Low-fidelity prototype submission
Low-fidelity prototype submission
Criteria Ratings Pts
Appropriateness
threshold: pts
30 pts Exemplary The prototype is on the right track, it demonstrates the useful insight of the project, and has the potential to effectively address the project goals.
22.5 pts Accomplished
15 pts Acceptable The prototype addresses some of the project goals but it will require further thinking and/or significant revision to fully address all of them.
7.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype is not on the right track. Addressing the project goals will require the creation of a different prototype.
pts
30 pts
--
Completeness
threshold: pts
30 pts Exemplary The prototype contains sufficient detail to walk through the interaction sequence for at least three main user tasks and navigate between the tasks. It also includes extras such as task feedback and options for error recovery.
22.5 pts Accomplished
15 pts Acceptable The prototype has interaction that supports a subset of the main tasks from start to finish or the tasks can only be performed separately because of limited navigation. Some of the extras such as task feedback and error recovery might also be missing.
7.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype has no interaction supporting the tasks for the project.
pts
30 pts
--
Representation
threshold: pts
20 pts Exemplary The prototype is represented by a collection of physical user interface screens and simulated components or the equivalent in a digital low-fidelity prototyping tool.
15 pts Accomplished
10 pts Acceptable Some of the interaction in the prototype is drawn (e.g., arrows to indicate navigation between screens) and cannot be simulated in a user walkthrough.
5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype is a collection of drawn sketches on a single sheet of paper or the equivalent in a digital low-fidelity prototyping tool.
pts
20 pts
--
Slide design
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The design of the slide deck for the planned presentation enhanced the content. The choice of imagery, fonts, colors, and layout were effective; and the content had a logical organization.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The design of the slide deck had noticeable problems, such as fonts being too small, too much textual content on the slide, or illogical organization. The problems, though present, did not overpower the content.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The design of the slide deck had many noticeable problems, such as the fonts being too small, having too much text on the slides, or illogical organization. The problems overpowered the content.
pts
10 pts
--
Delivery
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The team delivered the prototype effectively, highlighted the key insights of the prototype, and were well prepared for the presentation.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The team delivered the presentation but there were noticeable issues with the delivery such as awkward pauses, skipping content, or team members interrupting each other or forgetting what to say.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The delivery of the presentation was ineffective because the team was unprepared.
pts
10 pts
--