Rubric

Keep in mind that 177 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Functional prototype initial submission
Functional prototype initial submission
Criteria Ratings Pts
Appropriateness
threshold: pts
40 pts Exemplary The prototype is on the right track and has the potential to effectively address the goals of the project.
30 pts Accomplished
20 pts Acceptable The prototype addresses some of the goals of the project but will require further thinking and/or significant revision to address all of them.
10 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype is not on the right track. Addressing the goals of the project will likely require the creation of a different prototype.
pts
40 pts
--
Progress
threshold: pts
40 pts Exemplary The prototype represents a complete draft of the project and demonstrated exceptional effort. It has interaction to support three or more of the main tasks and to navigate between the tasks. There are also extras such as good task feedback and options for error recovery.
30 pts Accomplished
20 pts Acceptable The prototype is incomplete (e.g., it has interaction for approximately half of the main tasks or limited navigation), or several critical parts of the prototype demonstrated minimal effort.
10 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The prototype was not submitted or did not have interaction for any of the main tasks.
pts
40 pts
--
Slide design
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The design of the slide deck for the planned presentation enhanced the content. The choice of imagery, fonts, colors, and layout were effective; and the content had a logical organization.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The design of the slide deck had noticeable problems, such as fonts being too small, too much textual content on the slide, or illogical organization. The problems, though present, did not overpower the content.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The design of the slide deck had many noticeable problems, such as the fonts being too small, having too much text on the slides, or illogical organization. The problems overpowered the content.
pts
10 pts
--
Delivery
threshold: pts
10 pts Exemplary The team delivered the presentation effectively, highlighted the key insights of the prototype, and were well prepared for the presentation.
7.5 pts Accomplished
5 pts Acceptable The team delivered the presentation but there were noticeable issues with the delivery such as awkward pauses, skipping content, or team members interrupting each other or forgetting what to say.
2.5 pts Emerging
0 pts Unacceptable The delivery of the presentation was ineffective because the team was unprepared.
pts
10 pts
--