You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Project: Submit user evaluation results of functional prototype

Due Dec 13, 2024 by 11:59pm
Points 100
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload

No additional details were added for this assignment.

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 186 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

User testing of the functional prototype

User testing of the functional prototype
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Participants 38330_1055 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary The participants recruited for the study represented the personas for the project or the participants engaged in designed role play that effectively simulated the personas. 38330_9601 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished 38330_6668 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable The participants recruited for the study were only partially representative of the personas for the project. 38330_1247 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 38330_8241 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The participants were not representative or described in relation to the personas for the project. 38330_5749 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Research Questions blank threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary Described and motivated three or more research questions. The questions were meaningful, appropriate, and testable for the project. 68047_8670 15 to >10.0 pts Accomplished 68047_9335 10 to >5.0 pts Acceptable Some of the research questions were not explained well or were inappropriate for the project. 68047_4649 5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 68047_6493 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No questions were described, were not appropriate for the project, or were not comprehensible. 68047_3176 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Method 68047_9190 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary The method was appropriate for answering the research questions and to gain insight into the project. The method included descriptions of the participants, role play, tasks, evaluation locations, dates, duration, what was observed, and what interview or survey questions were asked of the participants. There was enough detail that the method could be repeated. 68047_5120 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished 68047_2029 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable Missed opportunities to fully answer the research questions or gain insight (e.g., due to ineffective or incomplete task design). Alternatively, some critical details of the method (e.g., about the participants, tasks, or procedure) were missing, preventing replicability. 68047_2627 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 68047_2902 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No method was reported or was inappropriate for answering the research questions. 68047_7057 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Data Collection 68047_5809 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >7.5 pts Exemplary Data collection was complete, comprehensive, and insightful in relation to the research questions and project goals. The method of data collection and how the data related to the research questions was clearly explained. 68047_1878 7.5 to >5.0 pts Accomplished 68047_5287 5 to >2.5 pts Acceptable Part of the data collection was unclear, or related to only a subset of the research questions. 68047_4936 2.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 68047_1312 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No data collection was reported. 68047_3432 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Results and Interpretation 68047_9614 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	30 to >22.5 pts Exemplary Results were summarized to answer the research questions and drew from participant feedback, interaction data, and observations of use. The data was aggregated, visually summarized where appropriate, and interpreted in relation to the research questions and project goals. 68047_841 22.5 to >15.0 pts Accomplished 68047_4866 15 to >7.5 pts Acceptable Results were provided for only some of the research questions, were difficult to understand, or were not interpreted in relation to the research questions. 68047_3046 7.5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 68047_7506 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable No results were provided. 68047_8987 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 30 pts --
Design Ideas 68047_2282 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary Three or more non-trivial design ideas were described from the study results. The ideas were plausible and, if implemented, the design ideas would significantly improve the prototype. 68047_8049 15 to >10.0 pts Accomplished 68047_7729 10 to >5.0 pts Acceptable Three design ideas were described, but some were not plausible or would not improve the prototype. 68047_4818 5 to >0.0 pts Emerging 68047_9268 0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The design ideas were not described or were not relevant to the prototype. 68047_2685 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --